A defensible way to make AI-assessment decisions for teachers and school leaders.
Every school is under pressure to do something about AI. The Vouching Diagnostic Engine gives you a clear, evidence-backed next step, whichever seat you're in.
Whichever seat you're in, we start with your problem
You don't have time to become your school's AI champion.
Sunday afternoon, writing next week's assessment, wondering if AI just made it pointless. You don't need another framework. You need a fast, defensible way to design a task that still shows real student thinking.
Works in the ten minutes you actually have, at the moment you're designing the task.
See how it works for teachers →You need a school-wide answer you can defend.
Your board, your staff, and your parent community all want to know your school has a considered approach to AI, not just a policy document, but evidence behind it.
Evidence summaries and monthly reports your board can rely on.
See the evidence case for leaders →Not a generic AI-readiness score: a look at what's actually happening in your school
AI is already part of how students learn, research, draft, and prepare for assessment. The real question isn't whether students use AI. It's whether they're building AI literacy and critical thinking, working alongside AI thoughtfully, while assessment integrity and academic honesty stay intact.
The Vouching Diagnostic Engine looks at the real conditions shaping this in your school: how students are using AI, how confident your teachers feel, how clear your assessment and disclosure expectations are, and whether your current policy is landing the way you intended day-to-day.
What it helps identify
- Whether students are using AI to think, or to skip thinking
- Where teacher confidence needs support
- Whether your assessment and disclosure expectations are clear enough to hold up to scrutiny
- Whether your policy is translating into what actually happens in classrooms
- What the most realistic next step is for your school
You get a clear, easy-to-read summary, plus our recommendation on the next step
Teachers have told us clearly and directly where the real problem sits: the Sunday-afternoon moment, designing a task with no fast, reliable way to know if it still shows genuine student thinking. That part we've heard straight from teachers, not guessed at.
What we're testing with our founding partner schools now is whether a vouched task actually keeps student thinking visible in the classroom: real student work, not just our word for it. We'll share what we find, including where it doesn't work as well as we hoped.
The Vouching Diagnostic Engine is a new tool, currently in pilot.
We're building the evidence base with a small group of schools before a wider release. Founding partners get closer, more hands-on involvement while that happens, and help shape what the tool becomes.
Diagnostic Assessment
A single diagnostic review of your school's current AI-assessment position.
Full School Programme
An annual programme working with your leadership team and teaching staff, with monthly reporting.
System / Retainer
For dioceses, departments, or multi-school systems wanting one repeatable approach across sites.
Pricing is discussed directly once you get in touch: get a quote suited to your school's size and needs.
Get our free guide
The AI in Schools Guide: What to Look For and What to Do Next.
Ready to talk?
Not the person who signs off on this? Send this page to your school leader.